Region 14 Comprehensive Center — government-backed educational organization
User Experience Design User Experience Research November 2023 — April 2024

How can you improve access to valuable education materials for Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas?

Designed wireframes to publish education materials digitally for 4 states (find those out) and Moderated and analyzed rigorous user testing to deliver 13 actionable strategic and functional UX recommendations to drastically improve project planning tools for education professionals

My Role
Lead UX Designer & Researcher
Methods
Research · IA · Prototyping · Usability Testing
Team
UX design and research lead collaborating directly with the R14CC client team
Type
Wireframes, research plan and Task-based usability research study

01
My role & scope of leadership
Decision authority · Autonomy · Team direction · Vision-setting
Supervision level
Acted as the sole UX designer and Researcher on the project, operating with complete autonomy over the research synthesis and final recommendations.
Decision authority
Lead the wireframes of the Project Success framework from a PDF structure to a website experience. Unilaterally analyzed testing transcripts and user interactions to define the 13 areas for functional and strategic improvement.
Team Direction
Provided direct, actionable strategic directives to the R14CC team for future design and development iterations.
Client relationship ownership
Collaborated directly with the R14CC client team to refine and approve the wireframes, testing scripts, and managed the end-to-end moderation of all 6 stakeholder usability sessions.

02
The challenge & business context
Organization mission · Stakes · Stakeholder landscape · Constraints

The organization had created a highly valuable "Conditions for Successful Projects" (CSPs) framework, but it suffered from massive discoverability issues. Four out of six key target users were completely unaware that the center's website and public resources even existed. The challenge was amplifying their work to drive actual adoption of these planning tools.

Required designing for a highly diverse, specialized audience of education professionals ranging from elementary teachers to state education administrators with 18 to 30+ years of experience.The tools are crucial for under-resourced schools (e.g., districts under 1,000 students) making high-level project decisions. Better UX directly translates to better educational project outcomes and public funding utilization.

The brief

"Digitize the Conditions for a Successful Project framework and conduct usability testing to validate the designs with educators."

Organization's mission & scale: A government-backed educational organization dedicated to supporting state and district leaders, educators, and schools. The states who have access to the materials include Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas.
400K+
Educator Users
State
Reach

03
Design process & key decisions
Information architecture · Rationale · Cross-dept collaboration · Iterations
Step 01 — Information architecture

Transformed a highly dense academic framework ("Conditions for Successful Projects") into an interactive, digital learning portal.

Information architecture choices: To reduce cognitive overload while users read dense material, I recommended an architectural change to allow users to collapse or hide the sidebar navigation when deep inside an individual condition page. I also advised hyperlinking introduction icons to act as a "beginner-centric entry point" to help users bypass linear navigation.

Initial greyscale wireframes

Conditions for a Successful Project Wireframing


Step 02 — Key design decisions

I directed a pivot in the client's copywriting strategy. Testing revealed that their core acronym ("CSP") was widely recognized by users as "Charter School Program," causing immediate cognitive friction. I recommended overhauling the nomenclature to use the full framework name on first interaction.

I partnered directly with the Front-End Developer to ensure the UX vision was technically viable within the backend constraints. As a support to the U.S Department of Education, strict WCAG compliance was non-negotiable.

Design progression
Visual Designs of the CSPS

Visual Design


04
Research & discovery
Methodology · Participants · Synthesis · Key findings
Research Planning Usability Testing

Moderated, task-based Usability Testing using a collaboratively developed script to ensure consistent evaluation without leading the users.

Led and analyzed 6 education sector professionals (elementary teachers, counselors, state administrators, consultants) with diverse experience ranging from 18 to 30+ years. Two had visited the site previously; four were new.

Synthesis approach: Analyzed session transcripts, task success rates, and on-screen interactions to synthesize qualitative feedback into 13 actionable functional and strategic recommendations. Adapted usability testing to evaluate the comprehension of highly abstract academic frameworks ("Conditions for Successful Projects") rather than just standard UI interactions.

Stakeholders were shocked to learn that 4 out of 6 highly engaged target users were completely unaware that the center's website and public resources even existed. Furthermore, the core acronym "CSP" was found to already mean "charter school program" to users, causing immediate cognitive friction.

Stills of the cover of the findings document

Testing Findings


05
What I uniquely contributed
Original thinking · Frameworks created · Domain expertise · Mentoring moments
Approaches I pioneered

I pioneered an approach to usability testing that evaluated user comprehension of highly abstract academic methodologies (the "Conditions for Successful Projects" framework) rather than just standard UI interactions.

A judgment call I made under uncertainty

Against standard web design conventions, I made the specific judgment call to recommend that external resources open in a new tab. My research proved that target users were becoming disoriented and losing their place within the dense academic framework. I also advised overhauling their core acronym ("CSP") after discovering it already meant "Charter School Program" to their users.

  • What would not have happened without me — The client would have been unaware that their target audience did not know the resource existed. I discovered that 4 out of 6 highly relevant users were entirely unaware of the site's public resources.
  • I critically evaluated the client’s "State of the Project" scale, identifying that the increments between project stages were inconsistent and lacked uniform context, directly instructing them to revise the content model.

06
Outcomes & measurable impact
UX metrics · Downstream reach
WCAG 2.1 AA
Accessibility compliance achieved

Improved access to critical project planning methodologies for public school systems, specifically benefiting educational leaders managing under-resourced districts (e.g., schools with under 1,000 students).

  • Conducted rigorous usability testing across 6 specialized educational professionals with 18 to 30+ years of experience. Successfully distilled testing data into 13 high-impact, actionable functional and strategic recommendations.

07
Recognition & external validation
Client praise · Peer acknowledgment · Public presentation · Continued engagement
Client feedback

Secured direct alignment and approval from the Region 14 CC team on the testing script methodology prior to launch, validating the research approach

Engagement outcome

Formally presented the usability research findings and strategic recommendations to the R14CC client team and continued engagement for further improvements to the website.


08
Personal reflection
Learnings · What I'd do differently · How this changed my practice
What I'd do differently

I would have spent more time pre-evaluating the client’s existing institutional acronyms before testing. Discovering mid-test that their core framework acronym ("CSP") already meant "Charter School Program" to users was a massive friction point. I now conduct "acronym and jargon" audits prior to building user testing scripts.


What this changed in my practice

I learned to question standard web best practices when they conflict with user comprehension. While opening external links in a new tab is heavily debated in UX, my testing proved it was an absolute necessity for this specific audience, as users were becoming deeply disoriented when navigating dense academic frameworks.


What this changed in my design and research process

I adapted my usability testing methodology to evaluate abstract conceptual frameworks rather than just standard UI interactions. This shifted my research practice to focus heavily on comprehension and discoverability (revealing that users didn't even know the site existed) rather than just task-based click.

Thank you for looking through my work!
More projects are right here >>